I found this debate between biochemist Michael Behe and physicist Stephen Barr originally posted by the Discovery Institute and thought I would share this as well. I really appreciate the debate and Behe’s performance. Behe was certainly pressed for time and could have presented the material by condensing it more, but it was still good material. I find that many Darwinists begin the discussion (if they even permit discussion) by trying to rule out intelligent design out as science by definition, a problem of methodological naturalism. I appreciated Barr’s open approach to intelligent design, he did well. I’m sure I’ll be posting more on this later, until then, enjoy.
Is Intelligent Design Science? A Debate